@stephenanderson Expected nothing less 😉 Some examples of the ‘toolboxes’ that inspired my tweet: bit.ly/2pJjZKn bit.ly/34ex4Kz bit.ly/2OakfLQ bit.ly/34cIe2n bit.ly/338hbE5 bit.ly/34cQ4Jv bit.ly/2D6MuEN bit.ly/2XFblJk
by
joe lamantia
–
Recent Posts
- Long-Term Outcomes: Customer-Centered Product Strategy For Machine Intelligence – Part 4
- Jaunt: “a social platform for sharing and discovering documents & presentations”
- Foundations: Customer-Centered Product Strategy For Machine Intelligence – Part 3
- Voice Over and Video – Flying Blind On a Rocket Cycle: Customer-Centered Product Strategy
- ‘The Present Future: AI’s Impact Long Before Superintelligence’
- Talking Product Strategy for Machine Intelligence @ ProductCamp Boston
- 16 years of @mojoe: (re)publishing a twitter archive
Tags
ai ai / ml augmented reality customer centered cyberpunk dead_media design systems enshittification enterprise enterprise architecture human agency infrastructure internet history llm machine intelligence patterns portfolio planning productcamp product development product discovery product management product strategy professional practice social utility technology and society transformation twitter ubiquitous computing user experience
6 responses to “”
@stephenanderson Most basically, I was reacting to what seems like a shift in the way people / companies / teams / consultants talk about what they do and how (in service of product development) from ‘here’s our process’ to ‘here’s our tooklit’.
@stephenanderson Might go so far as to say I have a hypothesis that we’re at one of those fulcrum moments around how the work gets done. In the historical structure of disciplines, there’s a recognizable cyclical oscillation of entry points: “We know the process” vs “We know the tools”.
@stephenanderson It’s the driving factors for the oscillation — how fast, how long to complete a cycle, can you change the pace of or even interrupt the swing, and where the field is at any particular moment — that’s most interesting (to me, when tweeting…).
@stephenanderson [Here I’m pre-blocking anyone tempted to employ the Cynefin maneuver {how’s that for a generationally triple work score via multi-layered Kevin Bacon / John Cusack ref…} – we know the core pattern in relative character & degrees of domain structuration.].
@stephenanderson Baseline ingredients are obviously a mixture of change vectors: rise of Lean practices, shifts to outcomes-centric cultures, decentralization of organizations, turbulence in org structures at all levels of scale / the death of hierarchy, network effects, etc.
@stephenanderson With all those pre-qualifiers – what’s your take? (And, anyone else? {Beuller?})