@cwodtke @indiyoung @jstanford1000 @steveportigal There’s lots of synthesis happening – just of a particular nature: implicit, ad-hoc, untested, individual, etc.
by
–
Recent Posts
- Long-Term Outcomes: Customer-Centered Product Strategy For Machine Intelligence – Part 4
- Jaunt: “a social platform for sharing and discovering documents & presentations”
- Foundations: Customer-Centered Product Strategy For Machine Intelligence – Part 3
- Voice Over and Video – Flying Blind On a Rocket Cycle: Customer-Centered Product Strategy
- ‘The Present Future: AI’s Impact Long Before Superintelligence’
- Talking Product Strategy for Machine Intelligence @ ProductCamp Boston
- 16 years of @mojoe: (re)publishing a twitter archive
Tags
ai ai / ml augmented reality customer centered cyberpunk dead_media design systems enshittification enterprise enterprise architecture human agency infrastructure internet history llm machine intelligence patterns portfolio planning productcamp product development product discovery product management product strategy professional practice social utility technology and society transformation twitter ubiquitous computing user experience
2 responses to “”
@cwodtke @indiyoung @jstanford1000 @steveportigal UX is not a knowledge-creating discipline, where successful outcomes = insight, understanding, awareness, etc.
@cwodtke @indiyoung @jstanford1000 @steveportigal To address the framing friction (we make stuff [witness the ‘product design’ shift] not knowledge), I charter design teams with continuous learning.